ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the cerebral blood flow circulation time (CCT) by contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and to explore the change rule of CCT in different degree of intracranial pressure, so as to provide a new method for non-invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure.Methods:Ten patients with hemorrhagic stroke or acute craniocerebral trauma with increased intracranial pressure were selected from Tangdu Hospital, the Air Force Military Medical University from January to December 2019. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound was performed when the invasive intracranial pressure (iICP) increased (>20 mmHg, iICP increased group) and decreased to normal (≤20 mmHg, iICP normal group), CCT was measured and analyzed. The differences of CCTs between different iICP groups were compared and the relationship between CCT and iICP was analyzed.Results:①The CCT on the lesion sides of the same patients in the iICP increased group was significantly longer than in the iICP normal group[(9.34±2.58)s vs (6.48±1.91)s, P=0.002]. ②When iICP was increased in patients with hemorrhagic stroke or acute craniocerebral trauma, the CCTs of the diseased side and the non-pathological side were not statistically significant [(9.34±2.58)s vs (9.01±3.22)s, P=0.809]. ③Pearson correlation analysis and Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that there were no correlations between patient′s breathing, heart rate, carbon dioxide partial pressure, body temperature, GCS score and CCT (all P>0.05). Age, mean arterial pressure and CCT were moderately correlated ( r=0.518, 0.463 and P=0.023, 0.046, respectively). ④Logistic regression analysis showed that CCT was an independent risk factor related to intracranial hypertension( OR=0.7, 95% CI=0.47-0.95, P=0.036). The area under ROC curve (AUC) predicted by logistic regression was 0.750(0.588~0.912). Conclusions:Contrast-enhanced ultrasound noninvasive assessment of CCT can reflect the intracranial pressure in patients with hemorrhagic stroke or acute traumatic brain injury, and CCT has a predictive value for intracranial hypertension. When the patient has limited conditions for invasive intracranial pressure monitoring, or when the invasive monitoring probe is pulled out but still needs to evaluate intracranial pressure, the change of CCT can provide an effective reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
ABSTRACT
To evaluate the accuracy of transcranial color‐code sonography ( TCCS) in non‐invasive assessment of intracranial pressure( ICP ) . TCCS was used to monitor the cerebral hemodynamic parameters of patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury after decompressive craniectomy and make estimation of the non‐invasive intracranial pressure ( ICPtccs) . Methods A total of 91 patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury involved in this retrospective study were divided into the ICP normal group( ≤22 mm Hg ) and the ICP increased group ( ＞22 mm Hg ) . T he correlation and consistency of middle cerebral artery blood flow parameters and ICPtccs with invasive intracranial pressure ( iICP ) were analyzed . According to Glasgow score ( GCS) ,Patients( GCS 3－8) were divided into acute extremely severe traumatic brain injury( GCS 3 －5) and acute severe traumatic brain injury ( GCS 6 －8 ) . A comparison was made of ROC ( ICPtccs) curve and the area under the curve( AUC) between the two groups were cornpared . Results①No statistical differences were found in cerebral hemodynamic parameters between the side with and without decompressive craniectomy in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury ( all P ＞0 .05 ) . ②M onitored resistive index ( RI) ,pulsatility index ( PI) and ICPtccs between the normal ICP group and the increased ICP group showed statistically significant differences ( all P ＜ 0 .05 ) ,w hile monitored systolic velocity ,diastolic velocity and mean velocity presented no statistically significant difference ( all P ＞0 .05) . T he correlations between RI ,PI with iICP were low ( r＝ 0 .247 ,0 .221 ; all P ＜ 0 .05 ) ,w hile there was a moderate correlation between ICPtccs and iICP( r ＝0 .417 , P ＜0 .001 ) . ③Bland‐Altman plot showed an overestimation of 2 .3 mm Hg ( 95% CI 0 .00－4 .59 mm Hg ) for ICPtccs compared to iICP . ④T he AUC of Glasgow score ( GCS 3－5 and GCS 6－8) in the two groups were 0 .759 ,0 .781 ( all P ＜0 .05) . All the cut‐off points of ICPtccs were 19 mm Hg ,with a sensitivity of 83 .33% ,81 .82% and a specificity of 64 .86% , 75 .68% ,respectively . Pairwise comparison of two AUCs showed no statistical difference ( P ＝ 0 .476) . ICPtccs presented the same ability to estimate ICP in patients with acute severe and extremely severe traumatic brain injury . TCCS could accurately assess the elevation of ICP in 72 .52% patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury . Conclusions TCCS can be used as a non‐invasive screening tool to assess w hether ICP of patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury is elevated and to semi‐quantitatively estimate ICP ,showing useful clinical value .